State of Maharashtra vs Kaitan Francis Parera Advocate - M. P. Patil — 84/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO120003832024

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

275/2024

Filing Date

19-06-2024

Registration No

84/2024

Registration Date

19-06-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

Excise Department

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Sushant B. Kambale

Respondent(s)

Kaitan Francis Parera Advocate - M. P. Patil

Tukaram Vishnu Mangale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

16-03-2026

Evidence

07-01-2026

Evidence

11-11-2025

Evidence

14-08-2025

Evidence

17-04-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-08-2024
Charge

On 20/08/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gargoti formally charged Tukaram Vishnu Mangale (72, agriculturist) with causing grievous hurt using a wooden stick, simple hurt by fists/kicks, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 504 (read with Section 34), allegedly committed with deceased co-accused Kaitan Fransis Parera against informant Thomas Fransis Parera on 06/07/2021. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial; proceedings directed to continue before the same magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

On 20/08/2024, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gargoti formally charged Tukaram Vishnu Mangale (72, agriculturist) with causing grievous hurt using a wooden stick, simple hurt by fists/kicks, and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 504 (read with Section 34), allegedly committed with deceased co-accused Kaitan Fransis Parera against informant Thomas Fransis Parera on 06/07/2021. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed trial; proceedings directed to continue before the same magistrate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case