State of Maharashtra vs Bajirao Appaji Ingale Advocate - G. T. Thakur — 38/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO120002862025

Filing Number

201/2025

Filing Date

23-Jul-2025

Registration No

38/2025

Registration Date

24-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

Bhudargad Police Station

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. D. A. Bansode APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bajirao Appaji Ingale Advocate - G. T. Thakur

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Criminal Case 38/2025, the State of Maharashtra v. Bajirao Appaji Ingale, the court ordered that charges under IPC Section 354(A) be added to the existing Section 354 charge in the chargesheet. After hearing both parties' arguments on whether subsections 354(A) through (D) were necessary, the court prima facie found Section 354(A) charges warranted and directed both parties to take note of this order dated March 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  7. 29-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  8. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Case 38/2025, the State of Maharashtra v. Bajirao Appaji Ingale, the court ordered that charges under IPC Section 354(A) be added to the existing Section 354 charge in the chargesheet. After hearing both parties' arguments on whether subsections 354(A) through (D) were necessary, the court prima facie found Section 354(A) charges warranted and directed both parties to take note of this order dated March 16, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case