Ekhanth bhimrav desai etc vs Suresh maruti desai etc Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil — 1500080/2016

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO120002522016

Filing Number

95/2016

Filing Date

07-May-2016

Registration No

1500080/2016

Registration Date

07-May-2016

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ekhanth bhimrav desai etc

    Adv. S. D. Bhosale

  2. 2.Yogesh Ekanth deasi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh maruti desai etc Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil

  2. 2.Vishawas Maruti deasi

    Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  6. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  7. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  8. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  9. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  10. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  11. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  12. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  13. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  14. 26-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  15. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  16. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  17. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  18. 17-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  19. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  20. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  21. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  22. 06-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  23. 24-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  24. 20-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  25. 27-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  26. 15-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  27. 23-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  28. 07-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  29. 13-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  30. 26-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  31. 21-Jun-2022

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  32. 04-Apr-2022

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  33. 18-Feb-2022

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  34. 18-Dec-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  35. 26-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  36. 06-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  37. 20-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  38. 18-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  39. 16-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  40. 23-Feb-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  41. 27-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  42. 04-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  43. 19-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  44. 13-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  45. 15-Apr-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  46. 17-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  47. 17-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  48. 04-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  49. 05-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  50. 20-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  51. 02-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  52. 27-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  53. 22-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  54. 27-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  55. 03-Oct-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  56. 24-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  57. 13-Jul-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  58. 28-Mar-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  59. 06-Dec-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  60. 10-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  61. 10-Mar-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  62. 24-Nov-2016

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 80/2016 The plaintiffs sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from obstructing a 5 ft. × 40 ft. lane through Grampanchayat House No. 7, which they claimed was an easementary way for access to their house. The court rejected the application, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of an existing easement. Evidence showed alternative access existed on the northern side of plaintiffs' property. The court concluded defendants are the lawful owners/possessors of the property, and no documented easementary right in favor of plaintiffs was proven. Application dismissed on 24/11/2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  63. 24-Nov-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  64. 12-Nov-2016

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  65. 26-Oct-2016

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  66. 01-Oct-2016

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  67. 21-Sep-2016

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  68. 06-Sep-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  69. 12-Aug-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  70. 29-Jul-2016

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  71. 06-Jun-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 07-May-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1500080/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 80/2016 The plaintiffs sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendants from obstructing a 5 ft. × 40 ft. lane through Grampanchayat House No. 7, which they claimed was an easementary way for access to their house. The court rejected the application, finding the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of an existing easement. Evidence showed alternative access existed on the northern side of plaintiffs' property. The court concluded defendants are the lawful owners/possessors of the property, and no documented easementary right in favor of plaintiffs was proven. Application dismissed on 24/11/2016. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case