Ganpati Sitaram Amrute etc. vs Ashok Narayan Kotkar etc. Advocate - S. H. Kadav — 1500067/2015

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO120002352015

Filing Number

1500085/2015

Filing Date

04-Jun-2015

Registration No

1500067/2015

Registration Date

04-Jun-2015

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganpati Sitaram Amrute etc.

    Adv. S. D. Bhosale

  2. 2.Shripati Sitaram Amrute

  3. 3.Ananda Sitaram Amrute

  4. 4.Dinkar Sitaram Amrute

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Narayan Kotkar etc. Advocate - S. H. Kadav

  2. 2.Pandurang Krushna Kotkar

  3. 3.Chandrakant Tukaram Kotkar

  4. 4.Santosh Narayan Kotkar

  5. 5.Shamrao Tukaram Kotkar

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  4. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  5. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  6. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  7. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  8. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  9. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  10. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  11. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  12. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  13. 09-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  14. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  15. 29-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  16. 05-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  17. 23-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  18. 23-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  19. 06-Nov-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  20. 25-Aug-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  21. 27-Jun-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  22. 20-Mar-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  23. 14-Feb-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  24. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  25. 18-Oct-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  26. 22-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  27. 20-Jun-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  28. 28-Mar-2022

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  29. 24-Jan-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  30. 27-Nov-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  31. 18-Oct-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  32. 25-Aug-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  33. 19-Jun-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  34. 26-Mar-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  35. 19-Jan-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  36. 09-Nov-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  37. 07-Oct-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  38. 18-Aug-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  39. 24-Jun-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  40. 22-May-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  41. 29-Apr-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  42. 06-Mar-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  43. 08-Feb-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  44. 21-Jan-2020

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  45. 19-Nov-2019

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  46. 18-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  47. 09-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  48. 28-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  49. 05-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  50. 12-Feb-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  51. 11-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  52. 09-Oct-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  53. 03-Aug-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  54. 13-Apr-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  55. 30-Jan-2018

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  56. 29-Aug-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  57. 24-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  58. 13-Jan-2017

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  59. 01-Oct-2016

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  60. 20-Sep-2016

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 67/2015. The application was allowed, and the defendants were restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' possession over the suit property (land Gat No. 218 in Mhasarang, Kolhapur) until the conclusion of the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction was not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  61. 20-Sep-2016

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  62. 17-Sep-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  63. 14-Sep-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  64. 07-Sep-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  65. 29-Aug-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  66. 10-Aug-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  67. 03-Aug-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  68. 08-Jul-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  69. 10-Jun-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  70. 13-Apr-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  71. 21-Mar-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  72. 17-Feb-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  73. 05-Feb-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  74. 02-Jan-2016

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  75. 28-Dec-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  76. 18-Dec-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  77. 14-Dec-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  78. 27-Nov-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  79. 06-Nov-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  80. 21-Oct-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  81. 03-Oct-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  82. 03-Sep-2015

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  83. 28-Aug-2015

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  84. 10-Aug-2015

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  85. 15-Jul-2015

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  86. 12-Jun-2015

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  87. 04-Jun-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1500067/2015

  88. 25-May-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 67/2015. The application was allowed, and the defendants were restrained from disturbing the plaintiffs' possession over the suit property (land Gat No. 218 in Mhasarang, Kolhapur) until the conclusion of the suit. The court found that the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, the balance of convenience favored them, and irreparable loss would result if the injunction was not granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case