State of Maharashtra vs Anita Maruti Pawar Advocate - Adv. — 39/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452, 427, 504, 506, 34. Status: B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120001742024
Filing Number
126/2024
Filing Date
18-Mar-2024
Registration No
39/2024
Registration Date
19-Mar-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
363
Police Station
Excise Department
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. D. A. Bansode APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anita Maruti Pawar Advocate - Adv.
-
2.Atul Anandarao Jadhav
Adv. Adv.
-
3.Swati Rajendr Kattamani
Adv. Adv.
Case History
-
26-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
02-Feb-2026
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
03-Jan-2026
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
13-Nov-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
07-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
22-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
11-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
12-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
09-Jan-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Reg.Cri.Case No.39/2024, the court ordered that summons be issued to accused Nos.1 to 3 on their new addresses. The prosecution reported that the accused's addresses had changed and requested updated summons, which the court granted, finding no serious prejudice to the accused by issuing summons at their new location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
19-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
14-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
18-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
19-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2024
Summary: In Reg.Cri.Case No.39/2024, the court ordered that summons be issued to accused Nos.1 to 3 on their new addresses. The prosecution reported that the accused's addresses had changed and requested updated summons, which the court granted, finding no serious prejudice to the accused by issuing summons at their new location. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts