Anant Narayan Sheti vs Vitthal Narayan Shetti etc. Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil1. — 1500032/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO120001452015
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1500046/2015
Filing Date
23-03-2015
Registration No
1500032/2015
Registration Date
23-03-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anant Narayan Sheti
Adv. N. B. Garule
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Narayan Shetti etc. Advocate - Sarjerav B. Patil1.
Vijaya vithal shetti
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil1.
paresh vithal shetti
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil1.
manisha anil morajakar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil1.
suvarna narayan belenekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil1.
turpati suryakant aradekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Balkrushna Narayan Sheti
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Ramchandra Narayan sheti
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Shrikant Narayan Sheti
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Sudhakar Narayan Shetti,
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Jaywanti Laxman Shetty
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Ajit Bhojraj Kanekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Mahadeo Bhojraj Kanekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Vijaykumar Bhojrao Kanekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Mahohar Bhojraj Kanekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Ravikant Bhojraj Kanekar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Jayashri V. Hulle
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Swati Sudhir Parkar
Adv. Sarjerav B. Patil
Sumati Madhukar Marye
Vaishali Vijay Revadekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Evidence Part Heard
Verification
Verification
Verification
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Verification | |
| 10-02-2026 | Verification | |
| 18-12-2025 | Verification | |
| 16-10-2025 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Maharashtra, Case No. 32/2015) involving land partition between co-owners. The court allowed (granted) the interim application filed by Defendant No. 6, restraining the plaintiff from cutting trees or interfering with property plot 152(b), which is in Defendant No. 6's possession. The court found insufficient evidence that the plaintiff cut trees in plot 152(b) and determined the balance of convenience favors the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a civil property dispute case (Maharashtra, Case No. 32/2015) involving land partition between co-owners. The court allowed (granted) the interim application filed by Defendant No. 6, restraining the plaintiff from cutting trees or interfering with property plot 152(b), which is in Defendant No. 6's possession. The court found insufficient evidence that the plaintiff cut trees in plot 152(b) and determined the balance of convenience favors the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts