State of Maharashtra. vs Anandrao Vyankoji Patil. Advocate - S. H. Kadav — 1500045/2006
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 409,420,465,468,471,477 a,201,120 b. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120001372006
Next Hearing
12th May 2026
Filing Number
1500045/2006
Filing Date
25-08-2006
Registration No
1500045/2006
Registration Date
25-08-2006
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
FIR Details
Police Station
Excise Department
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra.
Adv. Sushant B. Kambale
Respondent(s)
Anandrao Vyankoji Patil. Advocate - S. H. Kadav
Bharat Ganpati Kumbhar
Bhaskar Shankar Thakur
Sambhaji Gundopant Satoskar
Satish Jaywant Janwadkar
Ashok Shantram Nanodkar
Sitaram Vasantrao Thakur
Suvarna Bhaskar Thakur
Prasad Pandurang Walawalkar
Suresh Raghunath Deshpande
Adv. G. T. Thakur
Prakash Ganpati Jadhav
Anandrao Dattatray Patil
Ananda Hari Kamble
Sadanand Ramchandra Indulkar
Bal Suryaji Gopal Ghatage
Madan Raghunath Sawant
Sanjiv Shashikant Karpe
Adv. M. P. Patil
Bastyav Kistoba Bardeskar
Kamalatai Shantram Parulekar
Anita Ananda Kamble
Sharada Shashikant Prabhavale
Adv. S. H. Kadav
Ganpati Ramchandra Jadhav
Adv. S. H. Kadav
Ramchandra Dadu Kamble
Adv. S. H. Kadav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 19-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 05-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 24-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 21-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed – The court quashed and set aside the transfer ban order on immovable properties (agricultural plots) issued by the CID. The court held that under Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, police/investigating officers have no authority to seize, attach, or place restrictions on immovable property, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2019). The order was passed on November 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed – The court quashed and set aside the transfer ban order on immovable properties (agricultural plots) issued by the CID. The court held that under Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, police/investigating officers have no authority to seize, attach, or place restrictions on immovable property, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2019). The order was passed on November 24, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts