Satappa Shreepati Patil vs Krushnat Aanda Belekar — 65/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 06-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO120001302026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

104/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satappa Shreepati Patil

    Adv. PATIL KRISHNAT ALIAS SARJERAO BABURAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krushnat Aanda Belekar

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 65/2026 Summary: The court found prima facie evidence of cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Complainant Satappa Shreepati Patil claimed an outstanding debt from accused Krushnat Aanda Belekar, who issued a cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 dated 24/12/2025 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. After verifying compliance with statutory requirements (demand notice properly served and complaint filed within stipulated period), the court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of N.I. Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 65/2026 Summary: The court found prima facie evidence of cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Complainant Satappa Shreepati Patil claimed an outstanding debt from accused Krushnat Aanda Belekar, who issued a cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 dated 24/12/2025 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds. After verifying compliance with statutory requirements (demand notice properly served and complaint filed within stipulated period), the court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of N.I. Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case