Priyanka Sandip Wadekar vs Sandip Dilip Wadekar Advocate - S. D. Bhosale — 2/2019
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,20,21,22. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO120000802019
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
49/2019
Filing Date
12-02-2019
Registration No
2/2019
Registration Date
13-02-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Priyanka Sandip Wadekar
Adv. S. S. Sorate
Respondent(s)
Sandip Dilip Wadekar Advocate - S. D. Bhosale
Dilip Parshuram Wadekar
Adv. S. V. Shinde
Nirmala Dilip Wadekar
Adv. S. V. Shinde
Sandesh Dilip Wadekar
Adv. S. V. Shinde
Ashwini Sandesh Wadekar
Adv. S. V. Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 18-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Priyanka Wadekar's application for temporary custody of her two children under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was rejected on January 6, 2021. The court found that the respondent (husband) had been the primary caregiver since August 2018 and was properly maintaining the children's education and welfare. However, the applicant was granted visitation rights to meet her children once monthly by mutual convenience of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Priyanka Wadekar's application for temporary custody of her two children under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act was rejected on January 6, 2021. The court found that the respondent (husband) had been the primary caregiver since August 2018 and was properly maintaining the children's education and welfare. However, the applicant was granted visitation rights to meet her children once monthly by mutual convenience of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts