Pandurang Dattatray Bhat vs Krushan Gundu Parit etc. Advocate - Anandrao M. Patil — 4/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition

CNR: MHKO120000632017

Dismissal Order

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

28/2017

Filing Date

10-02-2017

Registration No

4/2017

Registration Date

13-02-2017

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Pandurang Dattatray Bhat

Adv. R. A. Naik

Respondent(s)

Krushan Gundu Parit etc. Advocate - Anandrao M. Patil

Jawahar Nanachanda sheetjishah

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

27-04-2026

Dismissal Order

16-03-2026

Dismissal Order

28-01-2026

Dismissal Order

12-11-2025

Dismissal Order

15-09-2025

Dismissal Order

Interim Orders

08-03-2021
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Pandurang Dattatray Bhat v. Krushan Gundu Parit (Regular Darkhast No. 04/2017) Outcome: Application Rejected Pandurang Bhat sought a temporary injunction to restrain the judgment-debtor from illegal construction on suit property during execution of a 1997 possession decree. The court rejected the application, finding that the appellate court had already stayed both execution and operation of the decree pending appeal decision, making it inappropriate for the executing court to decide the matter while the stay order remained in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Pandurang Dattatray Bhat v. Krushan Gundu Parit (Regular Darkhast No. 04/2017) Outcome: Application Rejected Pandurang Bhat sought a temporary injunction to restrain the judgment-debtor from illegal construction on suit property during execution of a 1997 possession decree. The court rejected the application, finding that the appellate court had already stayed both execution and operation of the decree pending appeal decision, making it inappropriate for the executing court to decide the matter while the stay order remained in force. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case