Shivaji Rajaram Patil vs Amol Dhanaji Varandekar Advocate - Adv. — 25/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120000552025
e-Filing Number
04-02-2025
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
04-Feb-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
04-Feb-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivaji Rajaram Patil
Adv. Prithviraj Chougule
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amol Dhanaji Varandekar Advocate - Adv.
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
17-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
27-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
18-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
18-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
12-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
03-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of a cheque bounce offense under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and the complainant complied with statutory notice and filing requirements. Consequently, process has been issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
06-May-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
28-Mar-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
14-Feb-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
-
04-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 25/2025
Summary: The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of a cheque bounce offense under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and the complainant complied with statutory notice and filing requirements. Consequently, process has been issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts