Shivaji Rajaram Patil vs Amol Dhanaji Varandekar Advocate - Adv. — 25/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO120000552025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2025
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
04-02-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
04-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Rajaram Patil
Adv. Prithviraj Chougule
Respondent(s)
Amol Dhanaji Varandekar Advocate - Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 17-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 27-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 18-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of a cheque bounce offense under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and the complainant complied with statutory notice and filing requirements. Consequently, process has been issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court found prima facie sufficient evidence of a cheque bounce offense under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused issued a cheque for Rs. 2,00,000 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and the complainant complied with statutory notice and filing requirements. Consequently, process has been issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts