Banabai Pandurang Powar vs Sharubai Jaysing Shinde Advocate - G. T. Thakur — 12/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO120000352021

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

19/2021

Filing Date

15-01-2021

Registration No

12/2021

Registration Date

16-01-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

Banabai Pandurang Powar

Adv. R. D. Thakur

Respondent(s)

Sharubai Jaysing Shinde Advocate - G. T. Thakur

Uttam Jaysing Shinde

Uday Jaysing Shinde

Gita Netaji Chavan

Bhujangrao Govind Shinde

Nivrutti Govind Shinde

Tarubai Krishna Shinde

Umesh Krishna Shinde

Sangita Sambhaji Shintre

Bharati Dattatray Powar

Chaya Baburao Patil

Balvant Vishnu Jadhav

Sampada Shivaji Bongarde

Nitin Vishnu Jadhav

Nanubai Krishna Patil (Tejam)

Aambubai Sadashiv Savant

Sajerao Vishnu More

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.M.F.C.Gargoti

05-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

24-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Civil Suit No.12/2021 at Gargoti Civil Court (dated 24/06/2025), the suit was ordered to proceed ex-parte against defendant No. 15 (Nanubai Krushna Patil) as he failed to appear despite proper service of summons. Additionally, the suit was ordered to proceed without written statement against defendant No. 17 (Sarjerav Vishnu More) for failing to file his written statement despite appearing through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Suit No.12/2021 at Gargoti Civil Court (dated 24/06/2025), the suit was ordered to proceed ex-parte against defendant No. 15 (Nanubai Krushna Patil) as he failed to appear despite proper service of summons. Additionally, the suit was ordered to proceed without written statement against defendant No. 17 (Sarjerav Vishnu More) for failing to file his written statement despite appearing through counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Gargoti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case