State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station vs Sagar Tanaji Jadhav Advocate - R. D. Jugale — 1150/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185,3(1),181. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO110019542025
Filing Number
1601/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
1150/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 10-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
166
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station
Adv. Government Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sagar Tanaji Jadhav Advocate - R. D. Jugale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Peth-Vadgaon convicted Sagar Tanaji Jadhav for drunk driving and driving without a valid license under sections 185 and 3/181 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (with 3 days imprisonment as default) for the first offense and Rs. 5,000 (with 3 days imprisonment as default) for the second offense, taking a lenient view since it was his first conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
27-Feb-2026
Filing of Surety
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1150/2025
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Peth-Vadgaon convicted Sagar Tanaji Jadhav for drunk driving and driving without a valid license under sections 185 and 3/181 of the Motor Vehicle Act. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 (with 3 days imprisonment as default) for the first offense and Rs. 5,000 (with 3 days imprisonment as default) for the second offense, taking a lenient view since it was his first conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts