Sadashiv Ramchandra Bhosale vs Subhash Pandurang Patil Advocate - R. D. Jugale — 218/2025

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 218/2025 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on November 18, 2025. Both parties must bear their own costs. Key Facts: Plaintiff Sadashiv Ramchandra Bhosale sought to prevent defendants Subhash Pandurang Patil and others from constructing on adjoining property, claiming he holds an easementary right of access through their land to the Borpadale-Vathar road. The defendants began construction on their property in October 2025, prompting this interim relief application. Court's Reasoning: The judge found no prima facie case, as photographs showed the plaintiff already had alternative access via an unpaved internal road (~10 feet wide), and no evidence demonstrated the defendants were actually disturbing his possession. The court noted the defendants would suffer greater loss (Rs. 1,00,000 spent on materials and drainage) than the plaintiff if enjoined, and reserved all substantive issues regarding easement rights for final trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.