Pandurang Ramchandra alias Sadashiv Chavan vs Kamal Mahadev Chavan — 228/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110017752022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
391/2022
Filing Date
20-10-2022
Registration No
228/2022
Registration Date
03-11-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandurang Ramchandra alias Sadashiv Chavan
Adv. M. J. Joshi
Respondent(s)
Kamal Mahadev Chavan
Hema Sanjay Mane
Vandana Sunil Garje
Dilip Tukaram Chavan
Sangita Ashok Bhosale
Savita Sampat Shinde
Vaishali Tukaram Chavan
Shankar Ramchandra alias Sadashiv Chavan
Bharat Vijay Jasud
Sharad Vijay Jasud
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 30-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Interim Relief The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction regarding a disputed property (Plot No. 1027) in Paregaon, Hatkanangale, Kolhapur. The court issued an interim order restraining Defendants 1-3 from carrying out any construction or altering the property's structure until final judgment. The court found the plaintiff has a legitimate claim to a share in the property through ancestral rights and that the defendants' actions pose an imminent threat to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Interim Relief The court allowed the plaintiff's petition for temporary injunction regarding a disputed property (Plot No. 1027) in Paregaon, Hatkanangale, Kolhapur. The court issued an interim order restraining Defendants 1-3 from carrying out any construction or altering the property's structure until final judgment. The court found the plaintiff has a legitimate claim to a share in the property through ancestral rights and that the defendants' actions pose an imminent threat to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts