State of Maharashtra vs Babaso Dada Patil — 171/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,408,420,467,468,471,474,477A,34. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO110017562022
Filing Number
1575/2022
Filing Date
01-Nov-2022
Registration No
171/2022
Registration Date
01-Nov-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
233
Police Station
Police Station Hatkanangale
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Governemnt Pleader
Respondent(s)
-
1.Babaso Dada Patil
-
2.Himmatrao Dattu Pol-Desai
-
3.Dhanyakumar Jangonda Patil
-
4.Balasaheb (Balaso ) Shamrao Gare
-
5.Ashok Shreepal Murchite
-
6.Suresh Jinpal Murchite
-
7.Bharat Bapuso Upadhey
-
8.Vijaykumar Bhagwan Shinge
-
9.Rushikesh Himmatrao Pol -Desai
-
10.Abhijeet Gopal Desai
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
20-Apr-2026
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Mar-2026
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
05-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 171/2022 Accused No. 6 (one of the respondents) filed a discharge application under Section 245 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 406, 408, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 477(a) read with Section 34, arguing the charges were baseless and the matter was civil in nature. The court rejected the application, finding prima facie involvement of the accused based on the FIR and chargesheet, and noting that lodging two separate FIRs does not constitute double jeopardy as the contents are distinct. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
28-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
12-Dec-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
01-Dec-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
24-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
27-Oct-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
12-Sep-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
08-Aug-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
07-Aug-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
18-Jul-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
07-Apr-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
10-Jan-2025
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
11-Nov-2024
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Jul-2024
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
09-May-2024
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
24-Jan-2024
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
19-Oct-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
28-Aug-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
11-Jul-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
08-May-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
10-Mar-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
13-Jan-2023
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
19-Nov-2022
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
14-Nov-2022
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
10-Nov-2022
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
05-Nov-2022
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
04-Nov-2022
Charge
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
03-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2022
Summary of Case 171/2022 Accused No. 6 (one of the respondents) filed a discharge application under Section 245 CrPC for offences under IPC Sections 406, 408, 420, 467, 468, 471, 474, 477(a) read with Section 34, arguing the charges were baseless and the matter was civil in nature. The court rejected the application, finding prima facie involvement of the accused based on the FIR and chargesheet, and noting that lodging two separate FIRs does not constitute double jeopardy as the contents are distinct. The case will proceed to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts