Datt Nagari Sahakari Pat Through Dhasharath Bacharam Patil vs Imran Sikandar Inamdar — 1013/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO110016902025
e-Filing Number
12-09-2025
Filing Number
1374/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
1013/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Datt Nagari Sahakari Pat Through Dhasharath Bacharam Patil
Adv. MANGAVE UMESH SHIVADATTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Imran Sikandar Inamdar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court order addresses a case between Datt Nagari Sahakari Pat (petitioner) and Imran Sikandar Inamdar (respondent) under the Cooperative Societies Act. The judgment clarifies that a check cannot be considered a valid proof of debt unless it is properly presented and dishonored, and that a mere check without protest or formal dishonor cannot establish a debt claim. The court ruled that the petitioner must follow proper legal procedures and provide documented evidence of the debt's validity according to court rules and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
11-Apr-2026
Compromise
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
14-Mar-2026
Compromise
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
02-Mar-2026
Compromise
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
09-Feb-2026
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
19-Dec-2025
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
07-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
26-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1013/2025
The court order addresses a case between Datt Nagari Sahakari Pat (petitioner) and Imran Sikandar Inamdar (respondent) under the Cooperative Societies Act. The judgment clarifies that a check cannot be considered a valid proof of debt unless it is properly presented and dishonored, and that a mere check without protest or formal dishonor cannot establish a debt claim. The court ruled that the petitioner must follow proper legal procedures and provide documented evidence of the debt's validity according to court rules and statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts