Rupali Sandeep Patsupe vs Sandeep Gopal Patsupe Advocate - Dinesh R. Thakare — 21/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHKO110014642025

Order on Exh

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

30-07-2025

Filing Number

1190/2025

Filing Date

02-08-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

04-08-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

Rupali Sandeep Patsupe

Adv. Naik Swapnil Jaykumar

Krishnavi Sandeep Patsupe Represented by Guardian Mrs Rupali Sandeep Patsupe

Adv. Naik Swapnil Jaykumar

Respondent(s)

Sandeep Gopal Patsupe Advocate - Dinesh R. Thakare

Gopal Govind Patsupe

Usha Gopal Patsupe

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon

27-04-2026

Order on Exh

10-03-2026

Order on Exh

04-03-2026

Order on Exh

22-01-2026

Order on Exh

12-01-2026

Order on Exh

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Petition Allowed with Conditions The First Class Magistrate Court at Pethvadgaon allowed the petitioner's application (Petition No. 25) to set aside a previous order, while imposing compensation requirements. The court directed Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 1,000 (one thousand rupees) to the petitioner as damages for the delay caused, and permitted the respondent's reply to be placed on the court record. The order was issued on 10/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Allowed with Conditions The First Class Magistrate Court at Pethvadgaon allowed the petitioner's application (Petition No. 25) to set aside a previous order, while imposing compensation requirements. The court directed Respondent No. 1 to pay Rs. 1,000 (one thousand rupees) to the petitioner as damages for the delay caused, and permitted the respondent's reply to be placed on the court record. The order was issued on 10/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case