State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station vs Prakash Pandurang Naik — 182/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324, 323, 34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO110013832021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1173/2021
Filing Date
07-09-2021
Registration No
182/2021
Registration Date
09-09-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
151
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station
Adv. Governemnt Pleader
Respondent(s)
Prakash Pandurang Naik
Kavita Deepak Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Peth-Vadgaon acquitted both accused Prakash Pandurang Naik and Kavita Dipak Jadhav of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 34 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the complainant and accused had settled the dispute out of court, creating significant doubt about the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Peth-Vadgaon acquitted both accused Prakash Pandurang Naik and Kavita Dipak Jadhav of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 34 (causing hurt with dangerous weapon) on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the complainant and accused had settled the dispute out of court, creating significant doubt about the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts