Bhagubai Hambirrao Ghatage Represented by Power of Attorney - Swapnil Ashok ghatge vs Ganpati Tukaram Yadav Advocate - C. S. Shikhare — 180/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,37,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO110012612023

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

337/2023

Filing Date

07-08-2023

Registration No

180/2023

Registration Date

17-08-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 36,37,
HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 6,

Petitioner(s)

Bhagubai Hambirrao Ghatage Represented by Power of Attorney - Swapnil Ashok ghatge

Adv. D. V. Yadav

Respondent(s)

Ganpati Tukaram Yadav Advocate - C. S. Shikhare

Anandibai Dagadu Gajbar

Sampat Tukaram Yadav(Legal Heir)

Geeta Manohar Patole

Kusum Maruti Ghatage

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

21-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

06-01-2026

Evidence

25-11-2025

Evidence

29-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-01-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of ancestral agricultural and residential properties among legal heirs. The District Court found that the plaintiff, as a daughter of the deceased (Tukaram Yashwant Yadav), has a legitimate right to her share in the inherited properties. The court rejected the defendants' objections and directed partition of the listed properties (including agricultural plots and residential land) according to legal succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petition filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of ancestral agricultural and residential properties among legal heirs. The District Court found that the plaintiff, as a daughter of the deceased (Tukaram Yashwant Yadav), has a legitimate right to her share in the inherited properties. The court rejected the defendants' objections and directed partition of the listed properties (including agricultural plots and residential land) according to legal succession laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case