Pramod Jaysingrav Chavan vs Tukaram Bhagwan Patil Advocate - D. M. Jadhav — 133/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34, 36. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110010272021
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
216/2021
Filing Date
05-07-2021
Registration No
133/2021
Registration Date
07-07-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C., Peth Vadgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramod Jaysingrav Chavan
Adv. R. B. Tambade
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Bhagwan Patil Advocate - D. M. Jadhav
Shailesh Shyamrav Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C., Peth Vadgaon
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 21-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 14-11-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by defendants to set aside the "no written statement" order is allowed. The court permits the defendant to file their written statement despite missing the stipulated deadline, construing CPC Rule 1 Order 8 as directory rather than mandatory to avoid grave injustice. However, the defendant must pay ₹200 as cost to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay and inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by defendants to set aside the "no written statement" order is allowed. The court permits the defendant to file their written statement despite missing the stipulated deadline, construing CPC Rule 1 Order 8 as directory rather than mandatory to avoid grave injustice. However, the defendant must pay ₹200 as cost to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay and inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts