Jyoti Sairaj Ghagare vs Sairaj Vikrant Ghagare Advocate - A. R. Kulkarni — 17/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO110008322024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-04-2024
Filing Number
718/2024
Filing Date
01-04-2024
Registration No
17/2024
Registration Date
01-04-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyoti Sairaj Ghagare
Adv. D. M. Jadhav
Respondent(s)
Sairaj Vikrant Ghagare Advocate - A. R. Kulkarni
Vikrant Viththal Ghagahre
Sangita Vikrant Ghagare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Petition No. 17/2024 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of ₹5,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the respondent (husband), effective from the date of filing the petition. The petitioner's plea for ₹50,000 monthly maintenance was partially rejected. Key Basis: The court found credible evidence of domestic violence including physical and financial abuse, abandonment, and deprivation of basic necessities by the husband who has substantial income from business and property rentals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Petition No. 17/2024 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance of ₹5,000 per month to the petitioner (wife) from the respondent (husband), effective from the date of filing the petition. The petitioner's plea for ₹50,000 monthly maintenance was partially rejected. Key Basis: The court found credible evidence of domestic violence including physical and financial abuse, abandonment, and deprivation of basic necessities by the husband who has substantial income from business and property rentals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts