Kanta Ashok Chavala vs Krushnath @ Kishor Shamu Kurne — 101/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 15, 16, 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO110007782021

Filing Number

167/2021

Filing Date

30-Apr-2021

Registration No

101/2021

Registration Date

10-May-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

4-4th Jt. Cjjd and JMFC Peth Vadgaon

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 15, 16, 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kanta Ashok Chavala

    Adv. R. T. Rai

  2. 2.Ravi Ashok Chavala

  3. 3.Nita Dipak Bodhwani

  4. 4.Seema Sunil Kukrecha

  5. 5.Reena Santosh Sevani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krushnath @ Kishor Shamu Kurne

  2. 2.Arjun Shamu Kurne

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  7. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  9. 12-Jun-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  10. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 101/2021 The court rejected an application by third-party Suryamala Sharadkumar Surpuriya seeking to be impleaded as a defendant in a specific performance suit. The court found she was not a necessary party since the agreement she executed with defendants (dated 03/01/2022) occurred after the suit's institution, making the doctrine of *lis pendense* applicable. The plaintiffs' relief did not directly concern her, and including her would unnecessarily complicate the suit into a title dispute. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 24-Mar-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  13. 03-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  14. 13-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon

  15. 10-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  16. 15-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  17. 21-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  18. 08-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  19. 20-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  21. 20-Apr-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  22. 14-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  23. 12-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  24. 14-Dec-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  25. 07-Nov-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  26. 04-Oct-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  27. 06-Sep-2023

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  28. 28-Aug-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  29. 28-Aug-2023

    Steps

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  30. 22-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  31. 19-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  32. 05-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  33. 20-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  34. 08-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  35. 17-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  36. 03-Apr-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  37. 16-Mar-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  38. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  39. 02-Feb-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  40. 10-Jan-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  41. 10-Jan-2023

    Hearing Without W.S.

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  42. 09-Nov-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  43. 26-Sep-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  44. 20-Aug-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  45. 14-Jul-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  46. 04-Mar-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  47. 11-Jan-2022

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  48. 16-Nov-2021

    No W.S. Order

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  49. 06-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  50. 07-Sep-2021

    Summons_Ready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  51. 29-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Notice

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  52. 07-Jul-2021

    Notice_Unready

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  53. 21-Jun-2021

    Unready Board

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  54. 09-Jun-2021

    Unready Board

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

  55. 11-May-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 30-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 101/2021 The court rejected an application by third-party Suryamala Sharadkumar Surpuriya seeking to be impleaded as a defendant in a specific performance suit. The court found she was not a necessary party since the agreement she executed with defendants (dated 03/01/2022) occurred after the suit's institution, making the doctrine of *lis pendense* applicable. The plaintiffs' relief did not directly concern her, and including her would unnecessarily complicate the suit into a title dispute. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case