Anusayabai Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir) vs Bharati Kantinath Lohar Advocate - R. R. Patil — 57/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110006152026
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anusayabai Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
Ashok Gunda Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
Dilip Gunda Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
Mangal Chandrakant Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule
Sambhaji Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
Shalan Sambhaji Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
Sukumar Sambhaji Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
Vaishali Ravindra Sutar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
Pallavi Mahesh Sutar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule
Respondent(s)
Bharati Kantinath Lohar Advocate - R. R. Patil
Sangram Bajirao Lohar
Adv. Samruddhi Ramesh Patil
Geetanjali Bajirao Lohar
Babaso Bajirao Lohar 5.
Anita Ashok Lohar 5.
Vishwajeet ashok Lohar 5.
Amit Ashok Lohar 6.
Sindhutai Dilip Lohar 6.
Nilesh dilip Lohar 6.
Indrajeet Dilip Lohar
Dhananjay Shripati Lohar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 02-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 22-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 13-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court denied the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants in this ancestral property dispute. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of construction activity or threats by defendants and determined no urgency or exceptional circumstances warranted the interim relief. A show cause notice was instead issued to defendants returnable on 13/04/2026 regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court denied the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants in this ancestral property dispute. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of construction activity or threats by defendants and determined no urgency or exceptional circumstances warranted the interim relief. A show cause notice was instead issued to defendants returnable on 13/04/2026 regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts