Anusayabai Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir) vs Bharati Kantinath Lohar Advocate - R. R. Patil — 57/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110006152026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
80/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
4-3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anusayabai Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
-
2.Ashok Gunda Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
-
3.Dilip Gunda Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule1.
-
4.Mangal Chandrakant Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule
-
5.Sambhaji Gunda Lohar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
-
6.Shalan Sambhaji Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
-
7.Sukumar Sambhaji Lohar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
-
8.Vaishali Ravindra Sutar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule2.
-
9.Pallavi Mahesh Sutar
Adv. Sanket Shrikant Chougule
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharati Kantinath Lohar Advocate - R. R. Patil
-
2.Sangram Bajirao Lohar
Adv. Samruddhi Ramesh Patil
-
3.Geetanjali Bajirao Lohar
-
4.Babaso Bajirao Lohar 5.
-
5.Anita Ashok Lohar 5.
-
6.Vishwajeet ashok Lohar 5.
-
7.Amit Ashok Lohar 6.
-
8.Sindhutai Dilip Lohar 6.
-
9.Nilesh dilip Lohar 6.
-
10.Indrajeet Dilip Lohar
-
11.Dhananjay Shripati Lohar
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
-
02-May-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
-
22-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
-
13-Apr-2026
Awaiting Notice
3rd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC PethVadgaon
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court denied the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants in this ancestral property dispute. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of construction activity or threats by defendants and determined no urgency or exceptional circumstances warranted the interim relief. A show cause notice was instead issued to defendants returnable on 13/04/2026 regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2026
Summary: The court denied the plaintiffs' prayer for ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the defendants in this ancestral property dispute. The court found insufficient documentary evidence of construction activity or threats by defendants and determined no urgency or exceptional circumstances warranted the interim relief. A show cause notice was instead issued to defendants returnable on 13/04/2026 regarding why a temporary injunction should not be granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts