Sushant Dattatray Dabade vs Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council Vadgaon Advocate - D. P. Patil — 58/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO110006092026

Issues

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

58/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

1-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Sushant Dattatray Dabade

Adv. Moh. I. A. Shaikh

Respondent(s)

Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council Vadgaon Advocate - D. P. Patil

Vadgaon Nagar Parishad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

08-05-2026

Issues

07-05-2026

Order on Exh

29-04-2026

Order on Exh

27-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

24-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

27-04-2026

Order on Exhibit

08-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Case 58/2026 Petitioner: Sushant Dattatray Dabade Respondents: Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council; Vadgaon Nagar Parishad Outcome: The petition was allowed with costs. The court granted relief to the petitioner, finding that the respondent municipal authority lacked proper legal justification to forcibly seize the property (a shop space, Gala No. 162) that the petitioner was lawfully operating as a food/meat business on lease. The court rejected the respondent's objections regarding unauthorized structures and permit violations, noting that proper procedures were not followed before attempting dispossession. The court directed that the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property be protected from unlawful interference by the municipal authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 58/2026 Petitioner: Sushant Dattatray Dabade Respondents: Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council; Vadgaon Nagar Parishad Outcome: The petition was allowed with costs. The court granted relief to the petitioner, finding that the respondent municipal authority lacked proper legal justification to forcibly seize the property (a shop space, Gala No. 162) that the petitioner was lawfully operating as a food/meat business on lease. The court rejected the respondent's objections regarding unauthorized structures and permit violations, noting that proper procedures were not followed before attempting dispossession. The court directed that the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property be protected from unlawful interference by the municipal authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case