Sushant Dattatray Dabade vs Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council Vadgaon Advocate - D. P. Patil — 58/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110006092026
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
79/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushant Dattatray Dabade
Adv. Moh. I. A. Shaikh
Respondent(s)
Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council Vadgaon Advocate - D. P. Patil
Vadgaon Nagar Parishad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Issues |
| 07-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: Case 58/2026 Petitioner: Sushant Dattatray Dabade Respondents: Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council; Vadgaon Nagar Parishad Outcome: The petition was allowed with costs. The court granted relief to the petitioner, finding that the respondent municipal authority lacked proper legal justification to forcibly seize the property (a shop space, Gala No. 162) that the petitioner was lawfully operating as a food/meat business on lease. The court rejected the respondent's objections regarding unauthorized structures and permit violations, noting that proper procedures were not followed before attempting dispossession. The court directed that the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property be protected from unlawful interference by the municipal authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 58/2026 Petitioner: Sushant Dattatray Dabade Respondents: Chief Officer, Vadgaon Municipal Council; Vadgaon Nagar Parishad Outcome: The petition was allowed with costs. The court granted relief to the petitioner, finding that the respondent municipal authority lacked proper legal justification to forcibly seize the property (a shop space, Gala No. 162) that the petitioner was lawfully operating as a food/meat business on lease. The court rejected the respondent's objections regarding unauthorized structures and permit violations, noting that proper procedures were not followed before attempting dispossession. The court directed that the petitioner's peaceful possession of the property be protected from unlawful interference by the municipal authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts