Savitri Madhukar Kamble vs Sakharam Madhukar Kamble Advocate - C. S. Shikhare — 47/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34,37,38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO110005552024

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

e-Filing Number

29-02-2024

Filing Number

85/2024

Filing Date

29-02-2024

Registration No

47/2024

Registration Date

01-03-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 34,37,38,

Petitioner(s)

Savitri Madhukar Kamble

Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MARUTI

Respondent(s)

Sakharam Madhukar Kamble Advocate - C. S. Shikhare

Alka Uttam Kamble

Shashikant Hindurao Kuditrekar

Varsha Shashikant Kudutrekar

Vishal Shashikant Kuditrekar

Chiman Ananda Kamble

Usha Vasant Sadare

Avela Ashok Varane

Sunita Dinkar Kamble

Sarita Shrirang Kamble

Nivas Gulab Kamble

Rajashri Ravindra Dhobale

Asha Kamlesh Kamble

Abhijit Vishnupant Chavhan

Lakshman Atmaram Kalokhe

Arvind Baburao Kurane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.

23-04-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

06-01-2026

Evidence

10-11-2025

Evidence

06-10-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

08-05-2024
Order on T.I.

Court Order Summary Case: Savitri Kamble v. Sakharam Kamble and Others | Civil Suit No. 47/2024 (Maharashtra) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent defendant no. 6 from constructing a house on disputed agricultural land. The judge found that the properties were already partitioned in 1988 among the common ancestor's three sons, with defendant no. 6 holding a lawful share. The court ruled the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked material suppression of facts, and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Savitri Kamble v. Sakharam Kamble and Others | Civil Suit No. 47/2024 (Maharashtra) Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for interim injunction seeking to prevent defendant no. 6 from constructing a house on disputed agricultural land. The judge found that the properties were already partitioned in 1988 among the common ancestor's three sons, with defendant no. 6 holding a lawful share. The court ruled the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, lacked material suppression of facts, and that the balance of convenience favored the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case