State Of Maharashtra vs Vinayak Dilip Powar — 54/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO110005112023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

378/2023

Filing Date

21-03-2023

Registration No

54/2023

Registration Date

24-03-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon

Judge

4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

23

Police Station

Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 379,

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Adv. Governemnt Pleader

Respondent(s)

Vinayak Dilip Powar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon

10-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

Arguments

28-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Peth-Wadvgaon acquitted accused Dilip Powar of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding insufficient evidence despite the complainant's allegations that the accused stole a Samsung Galaxy A32 mobile phone on January 10, 2022. The court noted that the complainant (sole witness) later reconciled with the accused outside court and failed to provide credible testimony linking the defendant to the alleged theft, leading to reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Peth-Wadvgaon acquitted accused Dilip Powar of theft charges under IPC Section 379, finding insufficient evidence despite the complainant's allegations that the accused stole a Samsung Galaxy A32 mobile phone on January 10, 2022. The court noted that the complainant (sole witness) later reconciled with the accused outside court and failed to provide credible testimony linking the defendant to the alleged theft, leading to reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case