Sangita Kakaso Mane vs Prashant Dhondiram Patil — 71/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110004972023
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
139/2023
Filing Date
21-03-2023
Registration No
71/2023
Registration Date
23-03-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sangita Kakaso Mane
Adv. S. N. Patil
Respondent(s)
Prashant Dhondiram Patil
Sushant Dhondiram Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd Jt. CJJD and JMFC PethVadgaon
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-12-2025 | Issues | |
| 05-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief petition in a property dispute case (Civil Case No. 71/2023). The plaintiff Sangita Kakaso claimed ownership of a closed structure (enclosed room) on her property and alleged that the defendant was unlawfully interfering with her possession. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case regarding her ownership and that the balance of convenience favored her, ordering the defendant to cease obstruction of her property rights and costs to be borne by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief petition in a property dispute case (Civil Case No. 71/2023). The plaintiff Sangita Kakaso claimed ownership of a closed structure (enclosed room) on her property and alleged that the defendant was unlawfully interfering with her possession. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case regarding her ownership and that the balance of convenience favored her, ordering the defendant to cease obstruction of her property rights and costs to be borne by the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts