Laxmi Babasaheb Kadam vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Government Pleader — 40/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Sec503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO110004192026
e-Filing Number
04-02-2026
Filing Number
377/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
664
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxmi Babasaheb Kadam
Adv. Sanjivani B. Patil
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Laxmi Babasaheb Kadam v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 to release her seized Splendor Plus Drum Motorcycle (MH-09-CN-6476) on supurtnama. The court found the applicant was the registered owner with valid documentation and reasoned that police stations are improper custodians of vehicles, which deteriorate over time during prolonged trials. The motorcycle was released on an Rs. 80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or structural modifications, and requiring the applicant's cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Laxmi Babasaheb Kadam v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 to release her seized Splendor Plus Drum Motorcycle (MH-09-CN-6476) on supurtnama. The court found the applicant was the registered owner with valid documentation and reasoned that police stations are improper custodians of vehicles, which deteriorate over time during prolonged trials. The motorcycle was released on an Rs. 80,000 indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or structural modifications, and requiring the applicant's cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts