Dhanaji Shankar Mane vs State Of Maharashtra — 39/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section Sec503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO110004162026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
374/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dhanaji Shankar Mane
Adv. Adv Samruddhi Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed Dhanaji Shankar Mane's application to recover his Vivo V50E5G mobile handset seized in Crime No.45/2026, finding he had established ownership through tax invoice and Aadhar card. The device was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs.30,000 with conditions that he produce it when directed, refrain from transferring or modifying it, and allow photographs for evidence documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
23-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
17-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
05-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
02-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
25-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
23-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2026
The court allowed Dhanaji Shankar Mane's application to recover his Vivo V50E5G mobile handset seized in Crime No.45/2026, finding he had established ownership through tax invoice and Aadhar card. The device was ordered released on an indemnity bond of Rs.30,000 with conditions that he produce it when directed, refrain from transferring or modifying it, and allow photographs for evidence documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts