Shahsikant Ganpati Zirange Through Rekha Shashikant Zirange vs Sachin Jayvant Zirange — 38/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110003002022
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
54/2022
Filing Date
08-02-2022
Registration No
38/2022
Registration Date
09-02-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahsikant Ganpati Zirange Through Rekha Shashikant Zirange
Adv. V. B. Patil
Respondent(s)
Sachin Jayvant Zirange
Sagar Jayvant Zirange
Sarika Dattatray Shikhare
Shital Sarjerav Mudugade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 13-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Temporary Injunction Application - ALLOWED The Civil Judge granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out construction on ancestral property in dispute. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of common ownership in the ancestral property without formal partition, that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and that irreparable loss would result without the injunction. The defendants are restrained from any construction and from creating third-party interests or encumbrances on the suit property until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Temporary Injunction Application - ALLOWED The Civil Judge granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from carrying out construction on ancestral property in dispute. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of common ownership in the ancestral property without formal partition, that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and that irreparable loss would result without the injunction. The defendants are restrained from any construction and from creating third-party interests or encumbrances on the suit property until final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts