Gayatri Shubham Kamble(Legal Heir) vs Shubham Babu Kamble Advocate - J. A. Jadhav — 3/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO110001122024
e-Filing Number
01-01-2024
Filing Number
84/2024
Filing Date
16-Jan-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
17-Jan-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
54
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gayatri Shubham Kamble(Legal Heir)
Adv. S. V. Shinde1.
-
2.Trusha Shubham Kamble
Adv. S. V. Shinde
-
3.Trusha Shubham Kamble Applicant No 1
Adv. SHINDE SUSHANT VASANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shubham Babu Kamble Advocate - J. A. Jadhav
-
2.Babu Ananda Kamble
-
3.Anita Babu Kamble
-
4.Suraj Babu Kamble
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Dismissal Order
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
25-Aug-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 3/2024 The court allowed the application filed by non-applicants (1-4) and set aside both the "No Say" order (dated 05/08/2024) and "No Cross" order (dated 27/11/2024) that had been passed against them. The non-applicants had sought relief citing an accident that prevented them from meeting their advocate and filing their response and conducting cross-examination within the stipulated period. The court found that principles of natural justice require giving the opposing party an opportunity to file submissions and conduct cross-examination for a fair decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
29-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
30-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Jun-2025
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Oct-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
10-Sep-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
03-Sep-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
05-Aug-2024
Hearing Without W.S.
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Jul-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
28-Jun-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
14-May-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
12-Apr-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
07-Mar-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
20-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2024
Case Summary: 3/2024 The court allowed the application filed by non-applicants (1-4) and set aside both the "No Say" order (dated 05/08/2024) and "No Cross" order (dated 27/11/2024) that had been passed against them. The non-applicants had sought relief citing an accident that prevented them from meeting their advocate and filing their response and conducting cross-examination within the stipulated period. The court found that principles of natural justice require giving the opposing party an opportunity to file submissions and conduct cross-examination for a fair decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts