Ramchandra Govind Belekar vs Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate - Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade — 4/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO110001092026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
5/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
5-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth Vadgaon
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramchandra Govind Belekar
Adv. V. V. Kamalakar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate - Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade
-
2.Sushila Ramrao Patil
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-May-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: Case 4/2026 Petitioner: Ramchandra Govind Belekar Respondents: Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate, Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade, Sushila Ramrao Patil Court: District Court, Kolhapur (Peth-Vadgaon) Date: 02.05.2026 Outcome The court dismissed the petitioner's application with costs. The petitioner sought a temporary injunction to prevent the transfer/sale of agricultural property (S.S. No. 90, Vadgaon) and claimed the respondents owed him Rs. 3,15,462 based on a written agreement dated 07.04.2016. The court found that the agreement was purely financial in nature for money recovery and did not create any ownership rights in the property for the petitioner. Since alternative remedies (debt recovery) were available, granting the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the respondents' rights without justified cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
27-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
18-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
07-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
25-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
04-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
27-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
24-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
16-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
02-Feb-2026
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
20-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
17-Jan-2026
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Case Summary: Case 4/2026 Petitioner: Ramchandra Govind Belekar Respondents: Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate, Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade, Sushila Ramrao Patil Court: District Court, Kolhapur (Peth-Vadgaon) Date: 02.05.2026 Outcome The court dismissed the petitioner's application with costs. The petitioner sought a temporary injunction to prevent the transfer/sale of agricultural property (S.S. No. 90, Vadgaon) and claimed the respondents owed him Rs. 3,15,462 based on a written agreement dated 07.04.2016. The court found that the agreement was purely financial in nature for money recovery and did not create any ownership rights in the property for the petitioner. Since alternative remedies (debt recovery) were available, granting the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the respondents' rights without justified cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts