Ramchandra Govind Belekar vs Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate - Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade — 4/2026

Case Summary: Case 4/2026 Petitioner: Ramchandra Govind Belekar Respondents: Santosh Ramrao Patil Advocate, Sadashiv Ravindra Bhendwade, Sushila Ramrao Patil Court: District Court, Kolhapur (Peth-Vadgaon) Date: 02.05.2026 Outcome The court dismissed the petitioner's application with costs. The petitioner sought a temporary injunction to prevent the transfer/sale of agricultural property (S.S. No. 90, Vadgaon) and claimed the respondents owed him Rs. 3,15,462 based on a written agreement dated 07.04.2016. The court found that the agreement was purely financial in nature for money recovery and did not create any ownership rights in the property for the petitioner. Since alternative remedies (debt recovery) were available, granting the injunction would cause irreparable harm to the respondents' rights without justified cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.