Suraj Prakash Bichakar vs State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station Advocate - Government Pleader — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO110000062026
e-Filing Number
31-12-2025
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
01-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
01-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Peth Vadgaon
Judge
1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
664
Police Station
Police Station Peth-Vadgaon.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suraj Prakash Bichakar
Adv. Adv.S.S.Dafale
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through Vadgaon Police Station Advocate - Government Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: 1-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Peth-Vadgaon.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 8/2026 Summary: The court granted Suraj Prakash Bichakar's petition to recover silver jewelry (weighing 3.658 kg, valued at ₹5,70,648) seized by Vadgaon Police Station in FIR 664/2025 following an alleged robbery on 23 December 2025. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentary evidence and undertook to maintain the property's original condition and produce it before the court when required. The court ordered release of the jewelry on an indemnity bond of ₹10,00,000 with specific conditions prohibiting alteration, sale, or unauthorized use of the material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 8/2026 Summary: The court granted Suraj Prakash Bichakar's petition to recover silver jewelry (weighing 3.658 kg, valued at ₹5,70,648) seized by Vadgaon Police Station in FIR 664/2025 following an alleged robbery on 23 December 2025. The court found that the petitioner had established ownership through documentary evidence and undertook to maintain the property's original condition and produce it before the court when required. The court ordered release of the jewelry on an indemnity bond of ₹10,00,000 with specific conditions prohibiting alteration, sale, or unauthorized use of the material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts