Pravin Tanaji Kadam Etc10 vs Vasant Krushnaji Kadam Etc5 Advocate - A. S. Kamble — 163/2016

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100018472016

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

185/2016

Filing Date

27-10-2016

Registration No

163/2016

Registration Date

27-10-2016

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22,34,38

Petitioner(s)

Pravin Tanaji Kadam Etc10

Adv. S. S. Nikam

Pranita Ashok Mane

Sarojini Tanaji Kadam

Suraj Shahaji Kadam

Savita Shahaji Kadam

Sunita Santosh Shelar

Smita Satish Patil

Anusaya Baburao Killedar

Usha Shivajirao Desai

Vijaymala Balwant Shelar

Respondent(s)

Vasant Krushnaji Kadam Etc5 Advocate - A. S. Kamble

Shankar Sitaram Kadam

Baban Sitaram Kadam

Anil Sitaram Kadam

Suresh Ramchandra Jadhav

Adv. S. N. Fagare

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

06-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

14-03-2023
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 1-4 to cross-examine the plaintiff on the affidavit (Exh. 21) in a land declaration suit regarding Gat no. 1223 of village Nool. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the plaintiff, noting that while the defendants' age warranted an opportunity to present their case, they had been given multiple opportunities since November 2021 without acting on them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application filed by defendants 1-4 to cross-examine the plaintiff on the affidavit (Exh. 21) in a land declaration suit regarding Gat no. 1223 of village Nool. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 payable to the plaintiff, noting that while the defendants' age warranted an opportunity to present their case, they had been given multiple opportunities since November 2021 without acting on them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case