Rupali Maheshkumar Hogale vs Maheshkumar Mahadev Hogale Advocate - Shahajirao B. Desai — 32/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12 18 18 e 19 20 22. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHKO100014642023

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

e-Filing Number

07-12-2023

Filing Number

985/2023

Filing Date

08-12-2023

Registration No

32/2023

Registration Date

08-12-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12 18 18 e 19 20 22

Petitioner(s)

Rupali Maheshkumar Hogale

Adv. R. I. Palkar

Respondent(s)

Maheshkumar Mahadev Hogale Advocate - Shahajirao B. Desai

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

18-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

17-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

10-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

20-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

21-01-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

19-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court partially granted the petition filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) was found to have prima facie established domestic violence allegations against the respondent (husband). The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of ₹3,000 per month to the petitioner from the date of petition filing until final judgment. The case is to proceed further with both parties presenting their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted the petition filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner (wife) was found to have prima facie established domestic violence allegations against the respondent (husband). The court ordered the respondent to pay interim maintenance of ₹3,000 per month to the petitioner from the date of petition filing until final judgment. The case is to proceed further with both parties presenting their evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case