1- Laxmibai Mahadev Powar alias Kandagal vs 1- Shewanta Narayan Powar alias Kandagal Advocate - S. B. Gorule — 186/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 23rd March 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100012952025

Case disposed

Filing Number

606/2025

Filing Date

30-09-2025

Registration No

186/2025

Registration Date

03-10-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 8
Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1- Laxmibai Mahadev Powar alias Kandagal

Adv. बी. बी. घाटगे

Respondent(s)

1- Shewanta Narayan Powar alias Kandagal Advocate - S. B. Gorule

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

W.S. and Say

14-03-2026

W.S. and Say

12-03-2026

W.S. and Say

20-01-2026

W.S. and Say

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 186/2025 Summary The court approved a settlement agreement reached between petitioner Laxmibai Mahadev Powar and respondent Shewanta Narayan Powar (filed under Exhibit 15), finding both parties had voluntarily agreed to the terms with court's consent. The court dismissed the case, directed the settlement agreement to be made part of the decree, ordered preparation of a settlement judgment incorporating the agreed terms and conditions, and directed refund of court fees to the petitioner. No order was passed on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 186/2025 Summary The court approved a settlement agreement reached between petitioner Laxmibai Mahadev Powar and respondent Shewanta Narayan Powar (filed under Exhibit 15), finding both parties had voluntarily agreed to the terms with court's consent. The court dismissed the case, directed the settlement agreement to be made part of the decree, ordered preparation of a settlement judgment incorporating the agreed terms and conditions, and directed refund of court fees to the petitioner. No order was passed on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case