Ravaso Annaji Jadhav vs Vasant Annaji Jadhav — 251/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420, 34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO100012222021
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
969/2021
Filing Date
08-12-2021
Registration No
251/2021
Registration Date
08-12-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravaso Annaji Jadhav
Adv. S. S. Nikam
Respondent(s)
Vasant Annaji Jadhav
Ganpati Vasant Jadhav
Usha Narayan Mangale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 04-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 18-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 14-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Criminal Misc. Petition No. 251/2021 - Order Rejected The complainant's petition seeking investigation under IPC Sections 420 and 34 was dismissed. The court found that the complainant failed to comply with procedural requirements under CrPC Section 154(1) and 154(3) for lodging an FIR, and the alleged dispute regarding land and property documents was primarily a civil matter rather than a criminal offense. The complainant was directed to pursue appropriate civil remedies instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Criminal Misc. Petition No. 251/2021 - Order Rejected The complainant's petition seeking investigation under IPC Sections 420 and 34 was dismissed. The court found that the complainant failed to comply with procedural requirements under CrPC Section 154(1) and 154(3) for lodging an FIR, and the alleged dispute regarding land and property documents was primarily a civil matter rather than a criminal offense. The complainant was directed to pursue appropriate civil remedies instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts