Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Chennai, Branch Turf Sunil Shankar Patil vs Bharati Madhukar Chavan Advocate - M. V. Patil — 371/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO100011072022
Filing Number
814/2022
Filing Date
08-Nov-2022
Registration No
371/2022
Registration Date
08-Nov-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. Chennai, Branch Turf Sunil Shankar Patil
Adv. S. N. Fagare
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharati Madhukar Chavan Advocate - M. V. Patil
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
10-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 371/2022 Outcome: The petitioner's application for correction/amendment was GRANTED. The court approved the petitioner's request to amend the company name in the FIR from "Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited" to "Shriram Finance Limited" based on government certification of the company's name change. The court found this to be a technical and procedural correction with no prejudicial effect on the respondent. The petitioner was directed to file the corrected FIR copy on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
18-Aug-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
13-Mar-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
26-Dec-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
11-Nov-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
14-Jun-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
13-Feb-2024
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
12-Dec-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Sep-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
14-Jul-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
19-May-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
17-Mar-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
02-Feb-2023
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
22-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 371/2022
Case Summary: 371/2022 Outcome: The petitioner's application for correction/amendment was GRANTED. The court approved the petitioner's request to amend the company name in the FIR from "Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited" to "Shriram Finance Limited" based on government certification of the company's name change. The court found this to be a technical and procedural correction with no prejudicial effect on the respondent. The petitioner was directed to file the corrected FIR copy on the court record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts