Bajirao Vitthal Alais Vithoba Desai vs Shrimati Parvati Shankar Desai Advocate - Parit s,s, — 206/2023

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100010512023

Issues

Next Hearing

22nd July 2026

Filing Number

553/2023

Filing Date

06-09-2023

Registration No

206/2023

Registration Date

13-09-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

Bajirao Vitthal Alais Vithoba Desai

Adv. V.D.Bhasme

Respondent(s)

Shrimati Parvati Shankar Desai Advocate - Parit s,s,

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

04-05-2026

Issues

16-03-2026

Issues

05-01-2026

Issues

20-11-2025

Issues

26-09-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

10-04-2024
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Civil Suit 206/2023 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Gadhinglaj Parties: Bajirao Vitthal (Vithoba) Desai v. Parvati Shankar Desai Order Date: 10 April 2024 Outcome The petition/application was granted. The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking execution of a prior judgment and decree (Civil Suit 73/2011) by ordering the implementation of an earlier court order to transfer property possession. The court found that the petitioner had proven his entitlement to the relief sought and ruled that the balance of justice favored the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Suit 206/2023 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Gadhinglaj Parties: Bajirao Vitthal (Vithoba) Desai v. Parvati Shankar Desai Order Date: 10 April 2024 Outcome The petition/application was granted. The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking execution of a prior judgment and decree (Civil Suit 73/2011) by ordering the implementation of an earlier court order to transfer property possession. The court found that the petitioner had proven his entitlement to the relief sought and ruled that the balance of justice favored the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case