Bajirao Vitthal Alais Vithoba Desai vs Shrimati Parvati Shankar Desai Advocate - Parit s,s, — 206/2023
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100010512023
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
Filing Number
553/2023
Filing Date
06-09-2023
Registration No
206/2023
Registration Date
13-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bajirao Vitthal Alais Vithoba Desai
Adv. V.D.Bhasme
Respondent(s)
Shrimati Parvati Shankar Desai Advocate - Parit s,s,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Issues |
| 16-03-2026 | Issues |
| 05-01-2026 | Issues |
| 20-11-2025 | Issues |
| 26-09-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit 206/2023 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Gadhinglaj Parties: Bajirao Vitthal (Vithoba) Desai v. Parvati Shankar Desai Order Date: 10 April 2024 Outcome The petition/application was granted. The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking execution of a prior judgment and decree (Civil Suit 73/2011) by ordering the implementation of an earlier court order to transfer property possession. The court found that the petitioner had proven his entitlement to the relief sought and ruled that the balance of justice favored the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit 206/2023 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Gadhinglaj Parties: Bajirao Vitthal (Vithoba) Desai v. Parvati Shankar Desai Order Date: 10 April 2024 Outcome The petition/application was granted. The court allowed the petitioner's application seeking execution of a prior judgment and decree (Civil Suit 73/2011) by ordering the implementation of an earlier court order to transfer property possession. The court found that the petitioner had proven his entitlement to the relief sought and ruled that the balance of justice favored the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts