Pallavi Amol Todkar vs Smt. Anjana Gopal @ Bhupal Uprathe Advocate - S. D. Dhanawade — 205/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100009522018
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
739/2018
Filing Date
21-12-2018
Registration No
205/2018
Registration Date
21-12-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pallavi Amol Todkar
Adv. A. G. Deshpande
Respondent(s)
Smt. Anjana Gopal @ Bhupal Uprathe Advocate - S. D. Dhanawade
Pratiksha Sanjay Manikeri
Jayashri Dattatray Chougule
Baburao Laxman Uprathe(Legal Heir)
Sandip Baburao Uprathe
Deepak Dadaso Mangle
Jayshing Baburao Kurale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Hearing
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 14-10-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Order Case No.: Reg. Case 205/2018 | Court: District Court, Garhchiroli (Maharashtra) Judge: R.M. Pawar, Additional District Judge | Date: 18 January 2024 Outcome The court approved three petitions filed by the plaintiff seeking to (1) condone the delay in recording witness statements against Defendant No. 4, (2) set aside an abetment order against Defendant No. 4, and (3) permit the recording of witness statements against Defendant No. 4 (Lakshman Uprate, deceased as of 14/10/2023). The court found the delay justified and ordered the plaintiff to file proper documentary evidence regarding the defendant's succession in the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Order Case No.: Reg. Case 205/2018 | Court: District Court, Garhchiroli (Maharashtra) Judge: R.M. Pawar, Additional District Judge | Date: 18 January 2024 Outcome The court approved three petitions filed by the plaintiff seeking to (1) condone the delay in recording witness statements against Defendant No. 4, (2) set aside an abetment order against Defendant No. 4, and (3) permit the recording of witness statements against Defendant No. 4 (Lakshman Uprate, deceased as of 14/10/2023). The court found the delay justified and ordered the plaintiff to file proper documentary evidence regarding the defendant's succession in the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts