Smt. Shobha Bhima Chougule, Through P. O. A. - Shri. Bhima Krushna Chougule vs Shri. Kalappa Powadi kamble Advocate - Sagar A. Patil — 223/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5, 37. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100009352022

Filing Number

559/2022

Filing Date

07-Sep-2022

Registration No

223/2022

Registration Date

07-Sep-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 5, 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Shobha Bhima Chougule, Through P. O. A. - Shri. Bhima Krushna Chougule

    Adv. Shantinath S. Patil

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Kalappa Powadi kamble Advocate - Sagar A. Patil

  2. 2.Shri. Ashok Bhima Kamble, LRS- Shri. Bhima Satappa Kamble

  3. 3.Shri. Baswani Bhimrao Kamble

  4. 4.Shri. Manohar Ningappa Kamble

  5. 5.Basawa Baap Rama Kamble

  6. 6.Shri. Uttam Aparai Kamble

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  3. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  4. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  5. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  6. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  7. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  8. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  9. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  10. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  11. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  12. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  13. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  14. 25-Apr-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  15. 15-Apr-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  16. 06-Apr-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  17. 02-Apr-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  18. 07-Mar-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  19. 27-Feb-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  20. 11-Jan-2024

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  21. 05-Dec-2023

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  22. 03-Oct-2023

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  23. 09-Aug-2023

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  24. 10-Jul-2023

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  25. 02-May-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: Civil Case 223/2022 Petitioner: Smt. Shobha Bhima Chougule (represented by Power of Attorney holder Shri. Bhima Krushna Chougule) Respondents: Shri. Kalappa Powadi Kamble (Advocate), Sagar A. Patil, and Shri. Ashok Bhima Kamble (LRS), along with Shri. Bhima Satappa Kamble and Shri. Baswani Bhimrao Kamble Outcome: The petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 (interim relief/injunction) was ALLOWED. The court granted an injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing the petitioner's possession of a disputed agricultural plot (Gat No. 378, measuring approximately 0.43 hectares, specifically 0.02 acres in dispute) located at Chandakud, Gadhingalaj, Kolhapur district. The petitioner was deemed entitled to relief based on documentary evidence of a prior agreement between parties regarding the land's transfer. Court costs were left for determination in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 02-May-2023

    Issues

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  27. 27-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  28. 15-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  29. 03-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  30. 13-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  31. 08-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  32. 27-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  33. 10-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  34. 11-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  35. 09-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  36. 24-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  37. 09-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  38. 01-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  39. 21-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  40. 30-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  41. 14-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj

  42. 07-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 07-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 223/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Case 223/2022 Petitioner: Smt. Shobha Bhima Chougule (represented by Power of Attorney holder Shri. Bhima Krushna Chougule) Respondents: Shri. Kalappa Powadi Kamble (Advocate), Sagar A. Patil, and Shri. Ashok Bhima Kamble (LRS), along with Shri. Bhima Satappa Kamble and Shri. Baswani Bhimrao Kamble Outcome: The petition under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 (interim relief/injunction) was ALLOWED. The court granted an injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing the petitioner's possession of a disputed agricultural plot (Gat No. 378, measuring approximately 0.43 hectares, specifically 0.02 acres in dispute) located at Chandakud, Gadhingalaj, Kolhapur district. The petitioner was deemed entitled to relief based on documentary evidence of a prior agreement between parties regarding the land's transfer. Court costs were left for determination in the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case