The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station vs Yuvraj Chalu Sawant Advocate - V. R. Naik — 86/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO100006722018
Filing Number
522/2018
Filing Date
26-Sep-2018
Registration No
86/2018
Registration Date
26-Sep-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
145
Police Station
Gadhinglaj Police Station
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Yuvraj Chalu Sawant Advocate - V. R. Naik
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 86/2018 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted Yuvraj Chalu Sawant of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 379 (theft) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole the complainant's motorcycle (registration no. KA 22/EA-7535) from outside a hospital on July 25, 2018. Key Reasoning: Although the panchanama (site inspection) was conducted, the complainant and other witnesses did not appear in court to testify, leaving the prosecution's case incomplete. The court found that without credible testimony proving the accused committed the theft, acquittal was warranted under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
12-Mar-2025
Order
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
28-Jan-2025
Order
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
23-Dec-2024
Order
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
09-Oct-2024
Order
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
07-Aug-2024
Proclomation
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
12-Jun-2024
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
15-Apr-2024
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
13-Feb-2024
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
22-Dec-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
30-Oct-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
29-Sep-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
28-Aug-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
25-Jul-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
15-May-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
09-Mar-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
07-Jan-2023
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
18-Nov-2022
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
19-Sep-2022
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
26-Jul-2022
Awaiting Warrant
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
17-Jun-2022
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
22-Mar-2022
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
29-Jan-2022
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
15-Jan-2022
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
14-Jan-2022
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
23-Nov-2021
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
06-Oct-2021
Hearing
2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
-
18-Aug-2021
Hearing
Second Civil Judge Jr.Dn . J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
06-Jul-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
04-May-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
23-Mar-2021
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
05-Dec-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
07-Sep-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
10-Jul-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
04-Jul-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
13-May-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
13-Mar-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
04-Feb-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
01-Jan-2020
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
21-Nov-2019
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
17-Sep-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn, and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
22-Jul-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn, and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
12-Jun-2019
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn, and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
11-Mar-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
22-Jan-2019
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
08-Dec-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
26-Nov-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
29-Oct-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
24-Oct-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
17-Oct-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
10-Oct-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
06-Oct-2018
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
28-Sep-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 86/2018
Case Summary: 86/2018 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted Yuvraj Chalu Sawant of charges under Indian Penal Code Section 379 (theft) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused stole the complainant's motorcycle (registration no. KA 22/EA-7535) from outside a hospital on July 25, 2018. Key Reasoning: Although the panchanama (site inspection) was conducted, the complainant and other witnesses did not appear in court to testify, leaving the prosecution's case incomplete. The court found that without credible testimony proving the accused committed the theft, acquittal was warranted under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts