Ramchandra Dhondiba Aaswale-3 vs Anand Tukaram Aasawale-12 Advocate - R. I. Palkar — 600190/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100006132013
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600416/2013
Filing Date
17-08-2013
Registration No
600190/2013
Registration Date
17-08-2013
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramchandra Dhondiba Aaswale-3
Adv. R. R. Chavan
Krishna Dhondiba Aswale
Ambubai Jotiba Aswale
Respondent(s)
Anand Tukaram Aasawale-12 Advocate - R. I. Palkar
Lata Vishnu Godas
Maya @ Shobha Sanjay Gurabe
Tulsabai Vishnu Aswale
Adv. R. S. Todkar
Vijay Vishnu Aswale
Ajit Vishnu Aswale
Bhimrao Dhondiba Aswale
Vitthal Dhondiba Aswale(Legal Heir)
Akkatai Bhairu Kalekar D.H.Vilas Bhairu Kalekar
Mumtabai Pundlik Bhosale
Ambubai Anandrao Harane
Indubai Shankarrao Yesare
Adv. S. B. Desai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 20-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by Respondent No. 13 seeking to set aside an order against him was dismissed. The court found that Respondent No. 13 failed to provide sufficient grounds or necessary documents to support his reversal petition, and the court ruled that allowing such reversal would obstruct the judicial process and deprive the plaintiff of legitimate remedies. The court directed that the plaintiff be permitted to proceed against Respondent No. 13 with full legal rights and remedies available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by Respondent No. 13 seeking to set aside an order against him was dismissed. The court found that Respondent No. 13 failed to provide sufficient grounds or necessary documents to support his reversal petition, and the court ruled that allowing such reversal would obstruct the judicial process and deprive the plaintiff of legitimate remedies. The court directed that the plaintiff be permitted to proceed against Respondent No. 13 with full legal rights and remedies available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts