Shweta Suraj Jadhav vs Suraj Ramchandra Jadhav Advocate - V. R. Patil — 11/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHKO100003512023
e-Filing Number
17-04-2023
Filing Number
241/2023
Filing Date
20-Apr-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
20-Apr-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn, and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shweta Suraj Jadhav
Adv. R. S. Todkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suraj Ramchandra Jadhav Advocate - V. R. Patil
-
2.Ramchandra Vaiju Jadhav
Adv. V. R. Patil
-
3.Vaishali Ramchandra Jadhav
Adv. V. R. Patil
-
4.Vikas Ramchandra Jadhv
Adv. V. R. Patil
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
28-Nov-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
17-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 11/2023 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Interim maintenance enhanced from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 per month; house allowance claim rejected. Key Facts: Shweta Suraj Jadhav sought enhancement of interim maintenance against her husband Suraj Ramchandra Jadhav, claiming he suppressed his actual income (Rs. 15-18 lac annually from Barclays Global Service Center) and had disclosed only Rs. 9,300 monthly earnings. She provided RTI Act documents proving material change in circumstances. The husband contested, denying the marriage was legal and arguing no change in circumstances warranted enhancement. Court's Finding: The court found a material change in circumstances based on RTI-obtained income evidence, entitling the applicant to enhanced maintenance. However, rejecting her claimed amount of Rs. 65,000 as unreasonable without justification, the court enhanced maintenance to Rs. 10,000 monthly from the order date. The house allowance claim was denied since she admitted living with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Sep-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
29-Aug-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
11-Aug-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
28-Jul-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
30-Jun-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
11-Jun-2025
Hearing
3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
-
25-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
29-Mar-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
21-Feb-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
21-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
03-Dec-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
05-Nov-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
08-Oct-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
03-Sep-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
26-Jul-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
29-Jun-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
06-Jun-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Jun-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
01-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
18-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
04-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
06-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
13-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
17-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
30-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
11-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
21-Dec-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
12-Dec-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
23-Oct-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
01-Sep-2023
Filing of Affidavit
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
11-Aug-2023
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
10-Jul-2023
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
-
05-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2023
Case Summary: PWDVA No. 11/2023 Outcome: Application partly allowed. Interim maintenance enhanced from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 per month; house allowance claim rejected. Key Facts: Shweta Suraj Jadhav sought enhancement of interim maintenance against her husband Suraj Ramchandra Jadhav, claiming he suppressed his actual income (Rs. 15-18 lac annually from Barclays Global Service Center) and had disclosed only Rs. 9,300 monthly earnings. She provided RTI Act documents proving material change in circumstances. The husband contested, denying the marriage was legal and arguing no change in circumstances warranted enhancement. Court's Finding: The court found a material change in circumstances based on RTI-obtained income evidence, entitling the applicant to enhanced maintenance. However, rejecting her claimed amount of Rs. 65,000 as unreasonable without justification, the court enhanced maintenance to Rs. 10,000 monthly from the order date. The house allowance claim was denied since she admitted living with her parents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts