The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station vs Lakhappa Bhimappa Melmati — 135/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO100002742026

Filing Number

229/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 10-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Gadghinglaj Police Station.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

1.The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

1.Lakhappa Bhimappa Melmati

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Gadhiglaj convicted accused Lakhappa Bhimappa Melmarti under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on 17/01/2026. The court found the accused guilty after he confessed to the charge and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000, with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
10-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate of Gadhiglaj convicted accused Lakhappa Bhimappa Melmarti under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on 17/01/2026. The court found the accused guilty after he confessed to the charge and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000, with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.