The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station vs Rahul Bhairu Patil — 14/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO100002322020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
199/2020
Filing Date
11-02-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
11-02-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Gadhinglaj Police Station
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Maharashtra-Gadhinglaj Police Station
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Rahul Bhairu Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 22-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rahul Bhairava Patil, of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354 (outraging modesty) and 506 (criminal intimidation) on March 10, 2026. The court found significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony regarding dates, locations, and sequence of events, and noted that critical evidence—such as verification of pesticide poisoning and call details from the relevant date—was either absent or insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rahul Bhairava Patil, of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354 (outraging modesty) and 506 (criminal intimidation) on March 10, 2026. The court found significant inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony regarding dates, locations, and sequence of events, and noted that critical evidence—such as verification of pesticide poisoning and call details from the relevant date—was either absent or insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts