1. Smt. Bharati Prakash Ingale Etc. 3 vs 1. Shri. Channabasdevaru Guruprabhuswami Viraktmath @ Prabhu Ayya Pardeshi Advocate - B. B. Ghatge — 29/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 40. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100002112020
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
90/2020
Filing Date
30-01-2020
Registration No
29/2020
Registration Date
31-01-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1. Smt. Bharati Prakash Ingale Etc. 3
Adv. Swati N. Rangnekar
Amit Prakash Ingale
Ranjit Prakash Ingale
Respondent(s)
1. Shri. Channabasdevaru Guruprabhuswami Viraktmath @ Prabhu Ayya Pardeshi Advocate - B. B. Ghatge
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Civil Judge Jr.Dn.and J.M.F.C.,Gadhinglaj
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 24-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 15-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 16-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The civil court order (dated 30/10/2023) partially allows the plaintiff's case against Defendant No. 1. The court awards the plaintiff Rs. 500 (in lieu of court fees) and directs Defendant No. 1 to pay the plaintiff an additional amount as per the court's assessment regarding the disputed claim. Defendant No. 1 is further required to furnish security and comply with the court's instructions regarding restitution of the disputed property/asset. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The civil court order (dated 30/10/2023) partially allows the plaintiff's case against Defendant No. 1. The court awards the plaintiff Rs. 500 (in lieu of court fees) and directs Defendant No. 1 to pay the plaintiff an additional amount as per the court's assessment regarding the disputed claim. Defendant No. 1 is further required to furnish security and comply with the court's instructions regarding restitution of the disputed property/asset. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts