Balu Bhau Patil vs 1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai — 23/2024

Case under Partition Act Section 4and6. Status: Hearing on NFL Appln.. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100002072024

Hearing on NFL Appln.

Next Hearing

22nd July 2026

e-Filing Number

12-12-2023

Filing Number

751/2023

Filing Date

13-12-2023

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

31-01-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 4and6
Specific Relief Act Section 34and38

Petitioner(s)

Balu Bhau Patil

Adv. Swati N. Rangnekar

Respondent(s)

1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai

2 Sau Nirmala Dilip Patil

3 Sau Pushpa Sunil Ajgekar

4 Shri.Santosh Rajaram Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

10-06-2026

Hearing on NFL Appln.

24-04-2026

Hearing on NFL Appln.

16-03-2026

Hearing on NFL Appln.

16-02-2026

Hearing on NFL Appln.

22-01-2026

Hearing on NFL Appln.

Interim Orders

05-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case