Balu Bhau Patil vs 1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai — 23/2024
Case under Partition Act Section 4and6. Status: Hearing on NFL Appln.. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100002072024
Next Hearing
22nd July 2026
e-Filing Number
12-12-2023
Filing Number
751/2023
Filing Date
13-12-2023
Registration No
23/2024
Registration Date
31-01-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balu Bhau Patil
Adv. Swati N. Rangnekar
Respondent(s)
1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai
2 Sau Nirmala Dilip Patil
3 Sau Pushpa Sunil Ajgekar
4 Shri.Santosh Rajaram Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
Hearing on NFL Appln.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
| 24-04-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
| 22-01-2026 | Hearing on NFL Appln. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts