Balu Bhau Patil vs 1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai — 23/2024

Case under Partition Act Section 4and6. Status: Hearing on Nfl Appln.. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Hearing on Nfl Appln. Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO100002072024

e-Filing Number

12-12-2023

Filing Number

751/2023

Filing Date

13-Dec-2023

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

31-Jan-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj

Judge

1-3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Act Section 4and6
Specific Relief Act Section 34and38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balu Bhau Patil

    Adv. Swati N. Rangnekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1 Shrimati Vimal Rajaram Patil Advocate - S. B. Desai

  2. 2.2 Sau Nirmala Dilip Patil

  3. 3.3 Sau Pushpa Sunil Ajgekar

  4. 4.4 Shri.Santosh Rajaram Patil

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  8. 02-Dec-2025

    Depositing Amount

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 05-Nov-2025

    Depositing Amount

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  13. 18-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    3rd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj

  14. 19-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  15. 21-Jan-2025

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  16. 19-Nov-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  17. 25-Sep-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  18. 19-Aug-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  19. 08-Jul-2024

    Hearing Without W.S.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  20. 22-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  21. 05-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.

  22. 31-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 13-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 23/2024 Balu Bhau Patil v. Vimal Rajaram Patil and Others The court allowed the petition filed by respondents 1-4 seeking to recall a default ("без кейниफयत") order and permitted them to file their written statement. The respondents claimed they were unable to file timely pleadings due to residing in different locations and delayed receipt of important property documents from revenue authorities. Although the court found their reasons insufficient, it considered the nature of the case and principles of natural justice warranted allowing the petition. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 1,200/- to be paid by respondents 1-4 to the petitioner, after which respondents will be permitted to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case