Smt.Nagavva Dundappa Jangnure Etc.2 vs Lakappa Martanda Jangnure Etc.2 Advocate - R. S. Todkar — 600045/2010
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ---. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO100001822010
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600045/2010
Filing Date
29-03-2010
Registration No
600045/2010
Registration Date
30-03-2010
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Gadhinglaj
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Nagavva Dundappa Jangnure Etc.2
Adv. S. K. Nandgave
Sou Parvati Martad Vanoru
Respondent(s)
Lakappa Martanda Jangnure Etc.2 Advocate - R. S. Todkar
Shankar Lakappa Jangnure
Lingavva Martad Jangnure
Ram Sidram Chougule
Bhima Sidram Chougule
Dundappa Sidram Chougule
Smt Savitri Dundappa Jangnure
Sushila Dundappa Jangnure
Shantadevi Dundappa Jangnure
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Gadhinglaj.
Evidence
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 22-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 12-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
The court order granted the petitioner's application to correct/amend the name and address of Defendant No. 1B in the original civil suit. The court directed that the corrected details be incorporated into the case record within 14 days and proper corrections be filed with the court. However, the document quality is severely compromised with significant OCR errors throughout, making detailed analysis challenging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order granted the petitioner's application to correct/amend the name and address of Defendant No. 1B in the original civil suit. The court directed that the corrected details be incorporated into the case record within 14 days and proper corrections be filed with the court. However, the document quality is severely compromised with significant OCR errors throughout, making detailed analysis challenging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts